And there is the problem that char seems to be missing. If a set of words means something in 1800, but means something else in 2000, then there is NO CONTRACT. It means nothing if it's meaning can change.

Again, char is saying "if a morgage contract says 5% interest on a 30 year load, and because of run away inflation, 15 years later the contract is said NOW to be 50% interests by the courts, because the money and conditions changed"

So in char's mind, the end justifies the means, even if it is based on lies and swindles. Just ask the American Indian what it means to have contracts changed without changin the wording.

Allan