If you'd actually bothered to read the decision, rather than going into a self-congratulatory circle jerk, you might have noticed these sections:

"This change in status is unremarkable in light of the traditional understanding of the militia as a part-time, nonprofessional fighting force. In Dunne v. People, 94 Ill. 120 (1879), the Illinois Supreme Court expressed its understanding of the term "militia" as follows:

"Lexicographers and others define militia, and so the common understanding is, to be `a body of armed citizens trained to military duty, who may be called out in certain cases, but may not be kept on service like standing armies, in time of peace.' That is the case as to the active militia of this State. The men comprising it come from the body of the militia, and when not engaged at stated periods in drilling and other exercises, they return to their usual avocations, as is usual with militia, and are subject to call when the public exigencies demand it." Id., at 138.

Notwithstanding the brief periods of federal service, the members of the State Guard unit continue to satisfy this description of a militia. In a sense, all of them now must keep three hats in their closets - a civilian hat, a state militia hat, and an army hat - only one of which is worn at any particular time. When the state militia hat is being worn, the "drilling and other exercises" referred to by the Illinois Supreme Court are performed pursuant to "the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress," but when that hat is replaced by the federal hat, the second Militia Clause is no longer applicable.

This conclusion is unaffected by the fact that prior to 1952 Guard members were traditionally not ordered into active service in peacetime or for duty abroad. That tradition is at least partially the product of political debate and political "

The Court also went on to explain that the civilian militias have historically been incredibly useless, giving rise not only to a standing army, but also the creation of the National Guard. While the Court pointed that if the state so chose, it could form and fund its own militia, that has yet to be done. The closest thing to that is the State Guards, but those are under control of the state government, and the governor. The groups you listed are private groups, whose only claim to being a legal militia is the name.

And I really could care less about Sarah Brady, but I guess it's a change of pace from the obsessive hatred of the Clintons.
Sometimes I feel like my shadow's casting me