I note that no one can dispute that our troops would be better off if Fonda had made the decisions on Iraq than they are now. But you're still running your mouths, saying nothing on point, and advocating the deaths of US military personnel if it will delay for a little while your having to admit you were wrong about Iraq while posing as people who care about them.

Kerry was mentioned earlier, and I dropped him. Why? Because in 2004, he advocated exactly the "surge" policy that Bush is implementing now. You guys should have voted for Kerry if you think surge is a good idea; he had it more than two years earlier than President AWOL. I thought it stank then and I think it stinks worse now, being way too late for it to do much good, though not too late to kill more of our troops.