Hunter's record is that of a reliably pro-business social conservative. He's not on the extreme fringe and will occasionally vote for higher taxes. Although he's financially involved with some military contractors, he does not seem to be a Duke Cunningham and is probably no more corrupt than the average Congressman.

Here's his '08 site. The entire position entry on "War on Terror" reads:

Quote:
Our success in protecting America from terrorists is completely dependant upon our ability to obtain and utilize reliable intelligence data. Our national intelligence and defense communities must be provided with the tools necessary to identify, track, stop and prosecute terrorists before they have the opportunity to strike. The fact that America has not been attacked since September 11th indicates to me that we are on the right course. I am confident we can remain on that course by providing our intelligence agencies with the resources they need while, at the same time, maintaining our commitment to the continued protection of our civil rights.


Basically, he thinks everything's going great and we need to trust and fund the CIA. If he has a position on Iraq, he's not sharing it. Not ready for prime time (and never will be), is my feeling, and I think it will be shared by Republican primary voters.